News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Keeping Abreast of cancer research 

Keeping Abreast of cancer research

18 Nov, 2008 03:00 AM
WOMEN in Leeton were given a positive message about life with and after cancer from a woman with first-hand and professional knowledge on Friday.

Adjunct professor of nursing at University of Canberra Linda Reaby was guest speaker at CanAssist luncheon at the Stan Axtill Centre.

Professor Reaby is a breast cancer survivor and has been awarded the medal of the Order of Australia for her work in research and advocacy for women with the disease. She was also named Australian Achiever of the Year and Woman of the Year in 1996.

“I am trying to give a message of hope and trying to make women more pro-active rather than re-active,” she said.

Professor Reaby is convenor and chair of the Australians New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group, has numerous scientific publications and has secured a number of research grants.

“Science has shown that women who participate in clinical trials do better and are more satisfied with their care,” she said.

“Women in the 21st century are treated in a far more scientific manner … due to clinical trials. Before clinical trials women used to be treated far more barbarically and as the result of clinical trials 85 per cent of women are surviving breast cancer.

“In 30 years we have come so far, there is far more breast conservation.

“If every woman gave a dollar a year to the Australian New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group, we could find a cure by 2020.”

Professor Reaby said mammograms are essential in diagnosing breast cancer as they can pick up tumours of three to five years of age, compared with the detection of tumours of five to 10 years of age in a physical examination.

She said people with a family history of breast cancer should begin having mammograms 10 years earlier than the age at which their relation was diagnosed.

Professor Reaby is also an advocate for women continuing to have breast screenings into old age, while they have quality of life, rather than stopping at the recommended age of 69.

“All women are at risk, just for being women, and this only came to light a couple of years ago,” she said.

“One in 11 women will develop breast cancer by the age of 75 and one in eight will develop it from 75 years and on, so it is very important women are pro-active and have self breast examinations, mammograms and physical examinations.”

She said women with a known genetic pre-disposition should consider regular MRIs, which she believes the government should subsidise, as well as mammograms.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
There is new technology available that is a pain free and really reliable way of discovering abnormal tissue. and it does not involve having a mammogram. It is called Sure touch and i had this done because of strong family history of breast cancer but i didnt want to go through any more mammorgrams now i go to sure touch once a year and have a digital breast exam it is so easy and simple and i know it can see more clearly then what a mammogram can! I highly reccommend a digital breast hopefully soon they will replace mammograms
Posted by Kell, 18/11/2008 2:34:06 PM
I am aware that there is new technology available. It is not harmful to women, is non-invasive and pain free. There is no radiation. It is suitable for women of all ages. I personally don’t like having mammograms because of the discomfort and pain. I am talking about SureTouch. There is a great deal of information to read about this fabulous product.
Posted by W Garner, 18/11/2008 3:15:33 PM
Professor Reaby is an inspiration and she is right we need to encourage new sources of early detection like the new SURETOUCH breast screen, this way younger women will start to schedule these painfree exams as apart of there general medical check ups.
Posted by benrenee, 18/11/2008 3:28:42 PM
I can't help but point out that there is new technology for breast screening now available called "Sure Touch". This equipment eliminates painful mammograms and radiation risks. It can painlessly examine women of all sizes and ages and can be done in the comfort of her local doctor's surgery. The reports are digitally document and recorded on a computer so that any changes can be added to the woman's history. This has to be the best and most non invasive method available to encourage women to take action on early detection of breast cancer and should be embraced by all women now!
Posted by Peta, 18/11/2008 4:45:50 PM
Mammograms (42 year old technology) are radiation and no radiation is acceptable today. The Sure Touch digital mapping system (4 year old technology) is noninvasive with no radiation and is early detection. I know what I would rather have, especially if I had family history as a risk factor. More radiation - a mammogram - when you already have a high risk factor is questionable.
Posted by DONNA FISHER, 18/11/2008 7:02:21 PM
Hi Have you heard about SURETOUCH? I Have had a SURETOUCH EXAMINATION as this new technology is now available. After investigation into this I was impressed that it is not harmful to women and presents better results than Mammagrams It is non-invasive, pain free (what a bonus) No radiation (I was always worried about having mammograms due to the risks associated with radiation, I had been having them every 2 years & this year would have been my 3rd time but I cancelled) I was impressed with SureTouch also because it is suitable for women of all ages I personally hate having mammograms because of the pain. (tiny boobs) My SureTouch Scan identified two very small cysts on my left breast which would have been outside of the area in which a mammmagram scans. I have girlfriends who had breast cancer diagnosed but mammagrams never picked up and now they are dead. Mammography is not effective enough and comes with the added risk of actually causing cancer. I have friends in USA and they say a huge % of American women are now not having Mammagrams due to the risk of increasing their chances of getting it due to the radiation. My question would be, of you, the reader, of this, What would you do if you knew those facts? Yeah, you bet you would not be having mammagrams either! Lets get behind this new technology and help younger women who have dense tissue and therefore Mammagrams are useless where SureTouch can detect differences and allow something to be done before it takes hold and then it is a long hard road to recover or DEATH. Kind regards Denise Wylie
Posted by Denny, 18/11/2008 9:58:06 PM
Professor Reaby says that women of the 21st century are treated in a far more scientific manner....but what is not said is they are examined with last century's old technology that at its best is harmful to the women. You only need to do the research on the web and you can find countless medical paper stating this fact. Radiation is a carcinogenic....mammography uses this deadly radiation to try and find cancers, but more often than not it will miss them or it can cause us to get cancer. The NCI even states this. I was told I needed a mammogram by my doctor as I am now in my forties so I did my research and I discovered these alarming facts that the mammogram people don't tell us. I then did more research and found a 21st century technology that whilst being new is still recording much higher accuracy rates than mammography and it is totally harmless. There is not pain and no radiation and it works well for all women, not just the older women without dense breast tissue. The thing that I liked was that there are some very highly regarded breast physicians now using it and supporting its use. This is the little SureTouch breast mapping system and I have now had my breast exam with this device and it was wonderful. I will definitely have another next year as it was a very good exam. I also have implants so there was no danger of them bursting. The doctor put me at ease with the results and I am very happy I did my homework and just didn't line up for a harmful mammogram like my GP wanted me to do.
Posted by 21st Century technology, 19/11/2008 8:53:51 AM
Breaking News - I have had yearly mammograms since my early 20's and have been told by my doctor that 6 monthly mammograms have been found to definitely cause breast Cancer. I have heard of a machine that does not have any radiation and it does'nt hurt either!!! Women of all ages are supposed to be able to use it. It is also supposed to be good at detecting lumps in fibro- cystic breasts which is what I have. (very hard breasts) apparently mammograms have a lot of difficulty finding lumps in these types of breasts.
Posted by young breast cancer , 19/11/2008 10:27:48 AM
Dangers and Unreliability of Mammography: Breast Examination is a Safe, Effective, and Practical Alternative Samuel S. Epstein, Rosalie Bertell, and Barbara Seaman International Journal of Health Services, 31(3):605-615, 2001. Mammography screening is a profit-driven technology posing risks compounded by unreliability. In striking contrast, annual clinical breast examination (CBE) by a trained health professional, together with monthly breast self-examination (BSE), is safe, at least as effective, and low in cost. International programs for training nurses how to perform CBE and teach BSE are critical and overdue. Mammography poses a wide range of risks of which women worldwide still remain uninformed.
Posted by Breast Cancer concerned, 19/11/2008 10:36:10 AM
I am now 40years of age and have been told that it is that time in life when I should be looking at a mammogram but have always been put off by the thought of the pain and radiation, I have recently been told about an alternative method to the conventional style mammogram - Suretouch Digital Breast Exam which is pain free, non invasive and without the fear of radiation, this is much more appealing and should be advertised greatly throughout doctors and specialists so that all women like myself that have put it off may feel more comfortable in making the decision to have this done.
Posted by Helen, 19/11/2008 8:20:14 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
BREAST KNOWLEDGE: Adjunct professor of nursing at the University of Canberra and breast cancer survivor Linda Reaby gave women on Friday a “message of hope” at a Can Assist luncheon at the Stan Axtill Centre.
BREAST KNOWLEDGE: Adjunct professor of nursing at the University of Canberra and breast cancer survivor Linda Reaby gave women on Friday a “message of hope” at a Can Assist luncheon at the Stan Axtill Centre.

Most popular articles




The Irrigator







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...